Robben v. Wagoner et al
| Todd Robben |
| James R. Wagoner, Candace J. Beason, Steven C. Bailey, Douglas R. Hoffman, Daniel B. Proud, Douglas C. Phimister, Dylan Sullivan, Suzann N. Kingsbury and Robert Baysinger |
| 2:2016cv03022 |
| December 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/26/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/18/2018 GRANTING Plaintiff 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an amended complaint. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 29 request for a stay and GRANTING plaintiff 30 days to file am amended complaint which complies with the requirements of the 3/17/2017 court order. The Clerk shall send a copy of the 3/17/2017 screening order with this order.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/04/17 DENYING 25 Motion to Stay. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint which complies with all of the requirements of the court's 3/17/17 order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/05/17 DENYING 23 request for a stay. Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint which complies with all of the requirements of the court's 3/17/17 order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/30/17 denying 21 Motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint which complies with all of the requirements of the court's 3/17/17 order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/3/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 11 ) is DENIED.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 04/14/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED; plaintiff' s 11 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; plaintiff has 30 days to file amended complaint. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/17/17 granting 6 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees shall be collected in accordance with the court� 39;s order to the El Dorado County Sheriff filed concurrently herewith. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff's request that he be permitted to file documents electronically 7 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/4/17 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the required fees in the amount of $400.00; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
