United States v. Salcedo

United States v. Salcedo

Plaintiff:	United States
Defendant:	Anthony Salcedo
Case Number:	2:2016mc00050
Filed:	March 10, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge:	Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 26, 2016	Filing 16 FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT (BANK ACCOUNTS) signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/26/16 ORDERING that The United States' Garnishment Application as to Anthony Salcedo 260 is GRANTED. Garnishee Chase Bank shall, within 20 days following s ervice of this Order, LIQUIDATE, PAY and DELIVER to the Clerk of Court $70,181.34 from Defendant's checking account No. x8272 and $30,112.44 from his savings account No. x6802 plus any subsequent deposits made to the accounts since 3/10/16.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 13, 2016	Filing 12 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/12/16, ORDERING that the action denominated reassigned to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in 2:16- MC-00050-MCE-EFB are h ereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:16-MC-00050-MCE-AC, United States v. Anthony Salcedo. The Clerk shall make the appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Kastilahn, A)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 26, 2016

Filing 16 FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT (BANK ACCOUNTS) signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/26/16 ORDERING that The United States' Garnishment Application as to Anthony Salcedo 260 is GRANTED. Garnishee Chase Bank shall, within 20 days following s ervice of this Order, LIQUIDATE, PAY and DELIVER to the Clerk of Court $70,181.34 from Defendant's checking account No. x8272 and $30,112.44 from his savings account No. x6802 plus any subsequent deposits made to the accounts since 3/10/16.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

April 13, 2016

Filing 12 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/12/16, ORDERING that the action denominated reassigned to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in 2:16- MC-00050-MCE-EFB are h ereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:16-MC-00050-MCE-AC, United States v. Anthony Salcedo. The Clerk shall make the appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Kastilahn, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States v. Salcedo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States
Represented By:	Kurt Didier, flu
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Anthony Salcedo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?