Canada v. Macomber et al
Plaintiff: Ronald Lee Canada
Defendant: Macomber and E. Roberts
Case Number: 2:2017cv00070
Filed: January 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/19/2017 ORDERING this action dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)
August 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/10/17 ordering that plaintiff is granted 30 days to file an amended complaint; if plaintiff does not intend to proceed with the instant action, he shall file a notice of voluntary dismissal within that time. (Plummer, M)
July 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/12/2017 ORDERING Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
May 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Ronald Lee Canada signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/19/2017. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
April 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/28/2017 GRANTING plaintiff 30 days to file a complaint. (Henshaw, R)
January 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's request for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 1 ) is DENIED without prejudice; Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file a complaint that complies with the requirements; Plaintiff shall also submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, the application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the filing fee in the amount of $400.00. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the courts form for filing a civil rights action, and the application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Canada v. Macomber et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Lee Canada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Macomber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?