Kelley v. CDCR ESP/SAC et al
| Patrick D. Kelley, Jr. |
| CDCR ESP/SAC, J. Lewis, G. Ellin, M. Soavedra and E. Vela |
| 2:2017cv00111 |
| January 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/24/2017 ORDERING the 22 Amended Petition construed as notification of voluntary dismissal and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/08/17 ordering petitioner shall file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus within 21 days of service of this order. Within 21 days of service of this order, petitioner must submit an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/21/2017 DISMISSING petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus with leave to amend within 30 days. Within 30 days, petitioner must submit an application to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner's 14 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. The Clerk shall send petitioner forms for application for writ of habeas corpus and ifp.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
