Tafari v. United States Postal Service et al
| Ras Hezekiah Tafari |
| Megan J. Brennan |
| 2:2017cv00113 |
| January 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yuba |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/3/2020 ADOPTING 104 Findings and Recommendations in full. DENYING 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. GRANTING 84 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
104
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/11/2020 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 81 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, defendant's 84 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, judgment be en tered against plaintiff and in favor of defendant, and the Clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Senior District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/4/2019 DENYING 94 Motion for Reconsideration and AFFIRMING the Magistrate Judge's Order 86 . (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER AFTER HEARING signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/6/19 DENYING 76 Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
75
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/14/2019 MODIFYING the 43 pretrial scheduling order as follows: Defendant shall make its initial expert disclosures by 3/1/2019; Any rebuttal disclosures shall be made by 3/15/2019; Motions to compel discovery shall be heard by 3/27/2019; All discovery shall be completed by 4/12/2019; All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be heard by 6/12/2019. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/8/19 GRANTING 72 Motion to Continue. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
70
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/23/18 WITHDRAWING 67 Motion to Appoint Counsel and Motion to Dismiss and REMOVING from THE 10/24/18 calendar. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER AFTER HEARING signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/26/2018 For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff's motion to Determine Sufficiency is DENIED. Further, plaintiff's deposition is confirmed for 5/11/2018, at 1:00 p.m. at the United States Attorney's Office, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/7/2018 DENYING 45 Motion for Order. The court finds that defendant timely responded to plaintiff's discovery request. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER adopting 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting 12 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/30/17: Plaintiff's claims two through seven are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/22/17 ORDERING that the 5/24/2017 hearing on defendant'smotion to dismiss is VACATED; and RECOMMENDING that defendant's motion to dismiss for lack o f jurisdiction (ECF No. 12 ) be granted and plaintiff's claims two through seven be dismissed without leave to amend. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER GRANTING 2 , 4 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the clerk to issue process. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal the required documents. The United States Marshal is DI RECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 90 days from the date of this order. The United States Marshal shall, within 14 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that said documents have been served. If the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason, to effect service of process on any defendant, the Marshal shall promptly report that fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned. (cc USMS) (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/23/2017 ORDERING that the plaintiff is directed to file, within 14 days of this order, a further affidavit which is dated and signed under penalty of perjury. The court will then resume consideration of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Jackson, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tafari v. United States Postal Service et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ras Hezekiah Tafari | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Megan J. Brennan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
