Lee v. City of Sacramento
Plaintiff: Ivan S. Lee
Defendant: City of Sacramento
Case Number: 2:2017cv00118
Filed: January 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/21 ADOPTING 83 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 68 defendant's Motion for Sanctions. (Kastilahn, A)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 83 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/19/2021 RECOMMENDING that 68 Motion for Sanctions be denied. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&Rs due within fourteen days.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/9/2020 ADOPTING 66 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 54 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement; DENYING 57 Motion to Set Aside Settlement Agreement; DIRECTING defendant to pay plaintiff $8,750 within 14 days of the date of service of this order; DENYING defendant's request for attorney's fees without prejudice to filing a properly-supported motion for attorneys' fees; and DISMISSING this action with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the parties' settlement agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 66 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/29/2020 RECOMMENDING that Defendant's 54 motion to enforce the settlement agreement be granted; Plaintiff's 57 motion to set aside the settlement agreemen t be denied; Defendant be directed to pay plaintiff $8,750 within 14 days of an order adopting these findings and recommendations; Defendant's request for attorneys fees be denied without prejudice to filing a properly supported motion for attorneys' fees; and this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the parties' settlement agreement. Matter REFERRED to District Judge John A. Mendez. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER RE SETTLEMENT & DISPOSITION signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/5/20. All dates currently set, including the 3/23/20 Jury Trial, are vacated. Dispositional Docs due by 4/20/2020. (Hinkle, T)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 39 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/2/19 MODIFYING the scheduling order as follows: Dispositive Motions to be filed by 12/17/19. Joint pretrial statement is due by 2/7/20. Dispositive Motions to be heard on 1/14/20 at 01:30 PM, Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/14/20 at 11:00 AM, and Jury Trial set for 3/23/20 at 09:00 AM, all in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Coll, A)
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/21/2018 IT IS SO ORDERED the trial date currently set on 3/11/2019 is VACATED; Trial Reset for 10/7/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; Discovery due by 5/31/ 2019; Dispositive Motions filed by 7/2/2019, and heard on 7/30/2019 at 1:30 PM; Expert disclosure pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(2) shall be 3/22/2019; supplemental disclosure and disclosure of any rebuttal experts by 4/5/2019; joint pre-trial statement due by 8/30/2019; and Final Pretrial Conference Reset for 9/6/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Reader, L)
August 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER denying the City's 23 Motion to Strike, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/3/17. The City shall file its Answer to the SAC within 20 days of this Order. (Kastilahn, A)
June 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STATUS (Pre-trial Scheduling) ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/7/17, ORDERING that all dispositive motions shall be filed by 11/6/2018. Hearing on such motions shall be on 12/4/2018. All discovery shall be completed by 9/28/2018. D esignation of Expert Witnesses due by 7/20/2018, and rebuttal disclosures due by 8/3/2018. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 2/1/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. Jury Trial is SET for 3/11/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez.(Kastilahn, A)
February 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/13/2017 ORDERING 11 that the referral of this case to the magistrate judge is WITHDRAWN, the 3/1/2017 hearing before the undersigned on defendant's motion to dismiss is VACATED and the case is REFERRED back to the district judge.(Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lee v. City of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ivan S. Lee
Represented By: Chijioke Ikonte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Sacramento
Represented By: Kathleen T. Rogan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?