Johnson v. Chan et al
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Defendant: Siu Keung Chan, Rita Ngan Chan and Haneshinder Singh Chauhan
Case Number: 2:2017cv00138
Filed: January 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/19/21 DISMISSING case against Haneshinder Singh Chauhan for Johnson's failure to comply with court orders and prosecute the case. All other defendants are terminated. See ECF No. 62. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 09/27/21 ORDERING plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed and closed for lack of prosecution. (Benson, A.)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/28/2020 ADOPTING 60 Findings and Recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 54 motion for default judgment against defendant Chauhan is DENIED without prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
August 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 60 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/25/2020 RECOMMENDING that 54 plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendant Chauhan should be DENIED without prejudice. Matter REFERRED to Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)
June 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/2/2020 ACCORDINGLY Defendant Haneshinder Singh Chauhan has yet to respond to the court's notification as ordered. The court ORDERS plaintiff to move for default judgment against defe ndant Haneshinder Singh Chauhan before the assigned magistrate judge within 30 days of this order. Should plaintiff not do so, the court anticipates dismissing the case against defendant Haneshinder Singh Chauhan for failure to prosecute. (Reader, L)
January 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/15/2020 GRANTING 34 Motion for Reconsideration and VACATING all hearing dates currently set. This matter is REFERRED to the court's ADR Coordinator for a VDRP session to take place in 30 to 60 days. Within 7 days of completion of the VDRP session, the parties are ORDERED to file a Joint Status Report with the court. (cc: VDRP Administrator) (Huang, H)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/30/19 DIRECTING the Clerk to serve a copy of this order to each defendant at 6530 Florin Rd, Sacramento, CA 95828. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve both defendant Rita Ngan Chan and Siu Keung C han with a copy of this order at 1095 Breckenridge St., San Leandro, CA 94579-2323. Defendants are hereby notified that their counsel is not eligible to practice law and cannot represent them in this case. Within 45 days, each defendant is ORDERED to file a document with the Clerk identifying the defendant's new attorney or indicating his orher wish to proceed pro se in this case. Plaintiff's 29 ex parte application to vacate pretrial deadlines and the 8/1/19 final pretrial conference is GRANTED and all deadlines are VACATED, to be reset when appropriate. (Kastilahn, A)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/8/2019 DIRECTING defendants' counsel, Mark T. Gallagher, to notify the court within 14 days of the date of this order whether counsel is eligible to practice law, and if he is not, to SHOW CAUSE why the court should not sanction him for failure to notify the court of his illegibility under Local Rule 184(b). Additionally, counsel is ORDERED to notify the court within 7 days whether he plans to substitute counsel for his clients. (York, M)
June 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/11/2019 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief as to his claims regarding the non-compliant restroom conditions, again with the exception of the claim regarding the contrast of the geometric symbol, and defendants are ORDERED to alter the restroom to make the facility readily accessible and useable by individuals with disabilities. A Final Pretrial Conference is SCHEDULED for 8/1/2019, at 02:30 PM, in Courtroom 3 (KJM), before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties are ORDERED to file the required joint pretrial statement by 7 days before. (York, M)
February 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/2/18, ORDERING that the motion hearing date of 2/7/2018 is VACATED. Counsel for each party will pay to the Clerk $100.00 within 10 days of this order as sanctions. The motion to compel 18 is STRICKEN. Failure to comply with this order may result in further sanctions. (cc: Financial)(Kastilahn, A)
January 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/25/2018 ORDERING 18 Motion to Compel Hearing is set for 2/7/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire; the Joint Statement required by Local Rule 251(a) is due on 1/31/2018. (Reader, L)
May 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/18/17: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 3/12/2018. Discovery due by 4/2/2018. Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 5/18/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/7/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Bench Trial set for 10/15/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Chan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Russell Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Siu Keung Chan
Represented By: Mark T. Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rita Ngan Chan
Represented By: Mark T. Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haneshinder Singh Chauhan
Represented By: Mark T. Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?