Kane v. State of California et al
| Daniel Michael Kane |
| People of the State of Calfornia, State of California, City of Sacramento and County of Sacramento |
| 2:2017cv00150 |
| January 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/6/17 RECOMMENDING that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr.; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 01/26/2017 GRANTING Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED; and Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amend ed complaint that complies with the requirements of the FRCP, and the Local Rules of Practice; the amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled "Amended Complaint"; plaintiff must file an original and two copies of the amended complaint; failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Jackson, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
