Gray v. CSP-Sacramento et al
Bernardos Gray, Jr. |
CSP-Sacramento and Sadighi |
2:2017cv00213 |
January 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/29/19 ADOPTING in full 18 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED(Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/07/19 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 13 ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/6/19 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in full; All claims against defendant CSP-Sacramento are DISMISSED without leave to amend. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/15/2019 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Bernardos Gray, Jr. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: Financial Department)(Henshaw, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.