Odom v. Adams
| Ryan Bigoski Odom |
| D.G. Adams |
| 2:2017cv00233 |
| February 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| John A. Mendez |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/29/2024 RECOMMENDING the 62 Motion to Amend be denied and the 25 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley.Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Kyono, V)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/28/2023 DENYING petitioner's 56 motion for appointment of counsel, GRANTING petitioner's 57 motion to substitute, and GRANTING petitioner's 60 motion for clarification to the extent clarification has been provided within this order and otherwise DENIED. Anissa De La Cruz, the acting warden at Central California Women's Facility, is substituted as respondent. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/03/21 GRANTING 48 Motion for Clarification to the extent set forth above. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/28/20 GRANTING 44 Petitioner's Motion. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is deemed submitted. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/13/2020 GRANTING 41 Motion for Extension of Time. Traverse due within 60 days from the service of this order. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/18/2020 GRANTING 37 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent to have up to and including 4/19/2020 to file a response to 25 First Amended Petition. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING 32 Findings and Recommendations in full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/22/20 DENYING Petitioner's 31 Request to Stay; GRANTING 27 Motion to Dismiss. Claims Two and Four of the first amended petition are DI SMISSED without prejudice as unexhausted; Claims Five, Six, and Seven of the first amended petition are DISMISSED as untimely; Respondent shall file a response to Claims One and Three of the first amended petition within 60 days. Petitioner's reply, if any, is due within 30 days after service of the answer. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
32
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/4/2019 RECOMMENDING that Petitioner's request for a stay (ECF 31 at 3) be denied. Motion 27 to dismiss be granted. Claims Two and Four of the amended petition be di smissed without prejudice as unexhausted. Claims Five, Six and Seven of the first amended petition be dismissed as untimely and respondent be directed to file a response to Claims one and three of the first amended petition within 60 days from the date of this order. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez, Objections due within 21 days after service of these F & R's.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/18/18 GRANTING 23 Request to lift the stay and granting 22 , 23 Motion for Extension of time. Within 30 days of service of this order, petitioner shall file an amended petition. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-open this case. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/19/18 ORDERING petitioner is to file a case status report within ten days of service of this order, afterwhich she is to continue filing a report every sixty days. Petitioner shall inform the court within thirty days of a decision by the states highestcourt exhausting her new claims, and shall at that time request a lift of the stay and file an amended petition setting forth all of her exhausted claims.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/2/2017 RECOMMENDING petitioner's 13 motion to stay pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003), be granted; petitioner be directed to immediately pro ceed to exhaust her state remedies; petitioner be directed to file a case status report every 60 days, advising the court of the progress of her state habeas petition; petitioner be directed that within 30 days of a decision by the state's highe st court exhausting her new claims she must notify this court of the decision and at that time request a lift of the stay and file an amended petition setting forth all of her exhausted claims; and the Clerk be directed to administratively close this case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/08/17 ordering respondent's deadline to respond to the petition is vacated and will be re-set at a later date. Petitioner's motion for stay 11 is denied without prejudice. 3. Within thirty days of service of this order, petitioner must do one of the following: a. File a motion for a stay under Kelly; b. File a motion to amend the petition to add in the unexhausted claims with a copy of the proposed amended petition attached and file a motion for a stay under Rhines; c. File a notice stating that she wants to proceed on the current petition without a stay. If petitioner does not take any action, the case will proceed on the original petition without a stay. (Plummer, M) Modified on 8/8/2017 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/10/2017 ORDERING petitioner shall submit, within 30 days, an application in support of her request to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee; and the Clerk shall send petitioner an ifp form. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Odom v. Adams | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ryan Bigoski Odom | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: D.G. Adams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
