Fritz v. Warden
Petitioner: Jamal D. Fritz
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 2:2017cv00263
Filed: February 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Tehama
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 8/25/2020 that the Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writof Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. The Clerk is to enter judgment accordingly. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/29/2019 DENYING Petitioner's 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Zignago, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fritz v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jamal D. Fritz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?