McNeely v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Daryl Wayne McNeely
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2017cv00335
Filed: February 15, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Shasta
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/1/19 AWARDING Daryl Wayne McNeely $6.900.00 in attorney fees. (Coll, A)
January 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/24/2019 NOT ADOPTING 26 Findings and Recommendations, DENYING 23 Motion for Summary Judgment, and GRANTING 20 Motion for Summary Judgment insofar as it requests a rehearing. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for rehearing on the specific issues outlined. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/13/18, RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's 20 motion for summary judgment be DENIED, the Commissioner's 23 cross-motion for summary judgment be GRANTED, the f inal decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED, judgment be entered for the Commissioner, and the Clerk be ordered to close this case. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
January 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/4/2018 ORDERING that Plaintiff's counsel shall personally pay $250.00 in monetary sanctions to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of this order. Plaintiff's counsel shall not attempt to recover that amount from his client, whether directly or indirectly. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in increased sanctions.(Washington, S)
April 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/10/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. Service of process is appropriate for the Commissioner of Social Security. The Clerk of the Court is directed to s erve the undersigned's scheduling order. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit service documents to the United States Marshal and shall file a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McNeely v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daryl Wayne McNeely
Represented By: Robert Weems
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?