Hogue v. Sacramento Police Department
| Brian Hogue |
| Sacramento Police Department |
| 2:2017cv00434 |
| February 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/26/2020 ADOPTING 29 Findings and Recommendations in full; This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, see FRCP 41(b), E.D. Cal. Local Rule 110; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
29
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/06/20 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/05/20 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion or a statement of no opposition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/13/2020 ORDERING, within 21 days, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the 25 motion to compel or a statement of no opposition. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 09/30/19 GRANTING defendant City of Sacramento's 17 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claim that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated by unreasonable search and seizure and his state law negligence claim are DISMISSED without prejudice as to defendant City of Sacramento. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/30/19 DECLINING to consider [17-2] the declaration of Joe Crady and DENYING 19 plaintiff's motion to convert the motion to one for summary judgment. Uni ted States District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., has been randomly assigned to this case. Henceforth, the case is 2:17-cv-0434 MCE EFB (PC). It is RECOMMENDED that 17 defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and plaintiff's claim t hat his Fourth Amendment rights were violated by unreasonable search and seizure and his state law negligence claim be DISMISSED without prejudice as to defendant City of Sacramento. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/30/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff to file either an opposition or a statement of no opposition to 17 Motion to Dismiss within 21 days of the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/10/2018 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Inmate Account of Brian Hogue. The Director of the Idaho Department of Corrections shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: Financial Department)(Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/6/2017 ORDERING plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to submit the requiredtrust account statement. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hogue v. Sacramento Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brian Hogue | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sacramento Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
