Maldonado v. City of Ripon et al
| Eduardo Maldonado |
| City of Ripon, Edward F. Ormonde, Richard Francis, Raul Hernandez, Anthony Demarinis, State of California and County of San Joaquin |
| 2:2017cv00478 |
| March 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 08/31/22 MODIFYING the following dates: Fact discovery: 02/27/23; Expert disclosures : 04/20/23 with Rebuttal expert witnesses due: 06/05/23 and Expert discovery completed by: 08/07/23; All dispositive motions, except for motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard by: 08/24/23. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/29/2021 GRANTING 31 Motion to Dismiss as follows: All claims asserted against Defendant Ormonde are DISMISSED without leave to amend and Defendant Ormonde is DISMISSED from this action; To the e xtent Plaintiff asserts Monell claims against the City in Counts Three and Seven, these claims are DISMISSED without leave to amend; Plaintiff's common law claim for false arrest/imprisonment (Count Three) is DISMISSED without leave to amend; P laintiff's claim for unlawful seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment (Count Three) is DISMISSED without leave to amend; Plaintiffs common law claim for negligent hiring, supervision, or retention (Count Seven) is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages is DISMISSED without leave to amend. Defendants shall file an answer with respect to the remaining claims in the Second Amended Complaint not later than 30 days after the date of electronic filing of this Order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/23/18 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 7 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file a Second amended complaint. Defendants are afforded twenty-one (21) days from the date Plaintiff files an amended complaint to answer the complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
