McElroy v. CDCR, et al.
| Latwahn McElroy |
| CDCR, Martines, Adam, Y. Ching, Y. Chang, E. McCumsey, P. Ngure, M. McClean, N. Bramucci and Director of Corrections |
| 2:2017cv00485 |
| March 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| William B. Shubb |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/25/2017 DENYING 14 Renewed Motion to Proceed IFP; DENYING AS MOOT 10 Motion for Instantaneous Action and Motion for Sanctions and 13 Request for Hearing; and RECOMM ENDING that 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/27/2017 DENYING Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the $400 filing fee no later than 14 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/8/2017 DENYING plaintiff's 8 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
