Roberson v. People of the State of California
Kenneth Wayne Roberson |
People of the State of California |
2:2017cv00531 |
March 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Glenn |
Allison Claire |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/25/18 RECOMMENDING that respondent's motion to dismiss 14 be granted and the petition be dismissed as unexhausted. This court decline to issue the certificate of appealability. Motion to Dismiss 14 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/19/2017 ORDERING, within 21 days, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending 14 motion to dismiss. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).(Yin, K) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/13/2017 DENYING without prejudice 7 Motion to Stay. Within 30 days of this order, petitioner may file motion for stay and abeyance under Rhines. If petitioner does not file a motion for stay or if he does not address all three Rhines factors, the court will proceed to order service of the petition without a stay and any unexhausted claims will be subject to dismissal unless the respondent explicitly waives the exhaustion requirement.(Henshaw, R) |
Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/13/2017 GRANTING petitioner's 5 motion to proceed IFP. Within 30 days, petitioner shall either (1) advise the court that he has exhausted his state court remedies or that they were unavai lable to him or (2) file a motion for stay and abeyance under Rhines while he returns to state court to exhaust his state court remedies. If petitioner does not respond to this order, the court will proceed to order service of the petition without a stay and any unexhausted claims will be subject to dismissal unless the respondent explicitly waives the exhaustion requirement. (Yin, K) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/24/17 ordering petitioner shall submit within 30 days from service of this order, an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis provided by the clerk of the court or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Roberson v. People of the State of California | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kenneth Wayne Roberson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: People of the State of California | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.