Wolinski v. Lewis et al
Krzysztof F. Wolinski |
J. Lewis, J. Porras, R. Ward, D. Brown, M. Gomez, R. Singh, J. Cheeseman, D. Celaya, B. Barrett, Constacio, A. Lopez, W. Golsch, R. Longshore and J. Penaflorida |
2:2017cv00583 |
March 17, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Morrison C. England |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 112 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/16/2024 GRANTING plaintiff 21 days to file any opposition to defendants' 106 motion for terminating sanctions. No further extensions of time will be granted to plaintiff. (Yin, K) |
Filing 109 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/22/2024 GRANTING defendants' 108 motion. The deadline to file motions for summary judgment is VACATED and this case is STAYED pending resolution of defendants' pending 106 motion for terminating sanctions. (Yin, K) |
Filing 103 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/31/2024 GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART the 102 Motion for Extension of Time. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that plaintiff Wolinksi's deadline to serve responses to Defendant 39;s written discovery request is EXTENDED to 6/30/2024 and the deadline to file a motion to compel is EXTENDED to 7/30/2024. The motion is DENIED to the extent that defendants request for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's motion for an ADA computer. This denial is without prejudice. If the court deems a response necessary, it will set a separate briefing schedule on plaintiff's motions. The dispositive motions deadline remains 8/29/2024. (Spichka, K.) |
Filing 99 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/7/24 GRANTING 98 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants Joint Response to 96 & 97 Motions due by 5/31/2024. (Kyono, V) |
Filing 95 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/15/2024 GRANTING the 94 Motion to Modify and MODIFYING the 93 Discovery and Scheduling Order as follows: Discovery and any Motions to Compel due by 5/30/2024 and Dispositive Motions filed by 8/29/2024. (Spichka, K.) |
Filing 89 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/26/2023 GRANTING 88 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall file a response to 69 Second Amended Complaint by 11/16/2023. (Lopez, K) |
Filing 87 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 10/12/23 DENYING AS MOOT 80 , 82 the Motions for Reconsideration of 77 the magistrate judge's decision denying Plaintiff additional time to file objections. The Court nonetheless construes the Objections and Recommendations subsequently filed at ECF No. 83 as a Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's own dispositive Order at ECF No. 78 . That Motion (ECF No. 83 ) is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 81 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/26/2023 DENYING plaintiff's 79 motion for an extension of time as moot. Within 30 days, defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's 69 second amended complaint. (Yin, K) |
Filing 78 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/18/2023 ADOPTING 75 The Findings and Recommendations in full; The following individuals who have been named as defendants in this action are herein DISMISSED on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to state viable claims against them: J. Lewis; J. Porras; D. Brown; J. Cheeseman; D. Celaya; B. Barrett; Constacio; and A. Lopez. This action shall proceed against Defendants W. Golsh; J. Penaflorida; R. Longshore; R. Ward; R. Singh; and M. Gomez.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 77 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/11/2023 DENYING the 76 Request for Extension of Time to File Objections to the 75 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING the 76 Request that prison personnel at California Health Care Facility be ordered to give him 10 hours a week of time to do research for his objections to the pending findings and recommendations as moot. (Spichka, K.) |
Filing 75 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/18/2023 ORDERING that 69 Second Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint states cognizable claims against the following defendants: W. Golsh, J. Penaflorida, R. Longshore, R. Ward, R. Singh, and M. Gomez. By separate order, after the District Judge rules on the findings and recommendations herein, the court shall direct these defendants to file a response to 69 Second Amended Complaint. It is RECOMMEN DED that the following individuals named as defendants be dismissed for failure to state claims upon which relief may granted: J. Lewis, J. Porras, D. Brown, J. Cheeseman, D. Celaya, B. Barrett, Constacio, and A. Lopez. Referred to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H) |
Filing 68 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/1/2021 GRANTING 67 Motion for Extension of Time and GRANTING Plaintiff up to and including 7/26/2021 to file his second amended complaint. Plaintiff is warned that absent exigent circumstances, no additional requests for extensions of time will be granted. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/12/2021 ORDERING 24 Amended Complaint has been screened and found to not state a claim for relief; ORDERING Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of service of this order; and GRANTING 62 Motion for Clarification to the extent that responsive information has been provided in this order and is otherwise denied. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 61 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/3/2020 DENYING 50 Motion for Reconsideration; DENYING 60 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Order. The Magistrate Judge's 10/21/2019, and 1/15/2019, orders areAFFIRMED; and No further Motions for Reconsideration of or Motions to vacate these orders will be considered. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 59 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/23/20 DENYING 58 Motion for copies and a copy of the court docket in this action. Plaintiff is informed that any further requests of copies for documents without payment will also be denied. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/13/2019 DENYING plaintiff's 49 motion for discovery, as premature and duplicative. (Yin, K) |
Filing 48 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/18/19 DENYING 45 Motion to Compel. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 42 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/13/19 ORDERING plaintiff Krzysztof Wolinksi (AC-1995), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has been ordered to pay sanctions in the amount of $1,000.00. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is authorized to collect from Plaintiffs inmate trust account monthly incrementsequal to twenty percent of the preceding months income credited to the trust account, provided that the amount in the trust account exceeds $10, until the sanctions award is paid. (cc: CDC Director)(Plummer, M) |
Filing 40 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/01/19 DENYING 38 motion to amend or alter judgment. Pursuant to ECF 36 , plaintiff shall pay to defendants $1000.00 in fees as sanctions. Within 14 days of the date of this order, counsel for defendants may file a proposed order with the court that directs the manner in which the appropriate entity shall collect the sanctions amount from plaintiff's prisoner trust fund account. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/14/19 GRANTING 29 Motion for sanctions. Within 30 days of the date of this order, counsel for defendants shall provide, via sworn declaration, a detailed accounting statement of the time expen ded and the costs the Office of the Attorney General incurred to prepare the motion for sanctions ( 29 , et seq.).Thereafter the court shall impose suitable monetary sanctions upon plaintiff that take defense counsels statements into consideration. The court formally admonishes plaintiff that the conduct identified by defendants has been found deceptive and harassing. Plaintiff shall cease these actions throughout the remainder of these proceedings; and plaintiff is warned that: (a) Similar actions taken by plaintiff in the future may result in a recommendation thathis lawsuit be dismissed; and (b) Plaintiff is required to follow all state and federal rules and laws throughout these proceedings. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/19/18 DENYING 31 Motion for an order directing Warden Martel to provide access to the prison law library. Within twenty-one days of the date of this order, plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing why defendants motion for sanctions 29 should not be granted. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/3/2018 ADOPTING 14 Findings and Recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Remand is DENIED. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/12/2017 GRANTING nunc pro tunc 25 Motion for Extension, DENYING as moot 22 Motion to Dismiss, and DENYING due to lack of jurisdiction 26 Motion for a court order. (York, M) |
Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/25/2017 DENYING 19 Motion for Court Order. Within 14 days of this order's entry, defendants' counsel to file a short written statement notifying the court of his findings regarding plaintiff's law library access. (Henshaw, R) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/08/17 ORDERING plaintiff must submit an amended complaint that complies with the requirements of this order within 30 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/7/2017 RECOMMENDING plaintiff's 12 motion to remand be denied. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/28/17 ordering plaintiff will have a final opportunity to submit his motion. Within 30 days of this order's entry, plaintiff should either submit his motion to remand or explain why there is good cause for a further extension. Having already granted plaintiff a ninety-day extension, the court is disinclined to extend the deadline further absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. (Plummer, M) Modified on 7/31/2017 (Plummer, M). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.