Ardds v. Constancio, et al.
Plaintiff: Antoine L. Ardds
Defendant: F. Constancio and Andre Lewis
Case Number: 2:2017cv00679
Filed: March 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/12/2018 ORDERING that the court takes no action on plaintiff's recent filings as this case is now closed. Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Henshaw, R)
May 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONSsigned by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/3/2018 ORDERING Clerk to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this action and RECOMMENDING 36 and 37 Plaintiff's "ex parte motions", construed as motions for temporary restraining orders, be denied without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
October 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Antoine L. Ardds signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/26/2017. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial)(Yin, K)
May 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/9/2017 GRANTING plaintiff's 6 request for an extension of time and plaintiff has 45 days to file an application for leave to proceed ifp. If plaintiff is unable to comply, he must submit to the court a copy of his request along with any response received from prison officials. The Clerk shall terminate plaintiff's 5 "Ex Parte Motion".(Yin, K)
April 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/10/2017 ORDERING plaintif has 30 days to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a). The Clerk shall mail plaintiff an ifp application form.(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ardds v. Constancio, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antoine L. Ardds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: F. Constancio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andre Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?