Ortiz v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Rene Ortiz |
Diversified Consultants, Inc. |
2:2017cv00713 |
April 3, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J. Newman |
Troy L. Nunley |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 56 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/20/2018 DENYING 54 Motion to Postpone Proceedings. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 47 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/1/18, RECOMMENDING that Defendants' 34 motion to dismiss be GRANTED without further leave to amend. The entire action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Pl aintiff's motion for default judgment 39 be DENIED. The Clerk be directed to close this case. It is ORDERED that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and recommendations. Matter referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/4/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff's request for the court to answer certain specified questions is DENIED. Plaintiff shall file any second amended complaint no later than 10/27/2017. Defendants shall respond to any second amended complaint within 21 days of its filing. No further extensions will be granted. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/21/17 ORDERING that DCI's 13 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; the first amended complaint is DISMISSED with 21 days LEAVE TO AMEND; defendants response due within 21 days after filing of amended complaint; Plaintiff's request for summary judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature; Plaintiff's 19 20 motions for default judgment are DENIED as premature and moot. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/31/17 ORDERING that plaintiff's 10 First Amended Complaint is DEEMED AUTHORIZED; defendant DCI's 3 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice as moot; any response to the first amended complaint shall be filed within 28 days. (Benson, A) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/24/17: The June 1, 2017 hearing on Motion to dismiss is VACATED. Request to appear telephonically at the hearing is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion no later than June 8, 2017.(Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ortiz v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rene Ortiz | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Diversified Consultants, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Harijot Singh Khalsa |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.