Mills v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Mills v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Mills v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Petitioner:	Kenneth Wayne Mills
Respondent:	California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Case Number:	2:2017cv00873
Filed:	April 25, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge:	John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 12, 2017	Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/12/2017 TRANSFERRING this matter to the Western Division of the USDC for the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
July 27, 2017	Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/27/2017 ORDERING, within 30 days, petitioner shall file an amended pleading notifying the court whether he wishes to proceed with this matter as a habeas action or a civil rights action. Pe titioner has 30 days to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a). The Clerk shall send petitioner the court's forms for an application for writ of habeas corpus and for a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. The Clerk shall also mail to petitioner a form application for leave to proceed ifp. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Yin, K)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 12, 2017

Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/12/2017 TRANSFERRING this matter to the Western Division of the USDC for the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

July 27, 2017

Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/27/2017 ORDERING, within 30 days, petitioner shall file an amended pleading notifying the court whether he wishes to proceed with this matter as a habeas action or a civil rights action. Pe titioner has 30 days to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a). The Clerk shall send petitioner the court's forms for an application for writ of habeas corpus and for a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. The Clerk shall also mail to petitioner a form application for leave to proceed ifp. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.(Yin, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mills v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Wayne Mills
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?