Thornberry v. Kernan et al
| Daniel Lee Thornberry |
| Scott Kernan, J. Bal, David Baugham, Michael Felder, M. Bobbala, James Chau and C. Smith |
| 2:2017cv00953 |
| May 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/7/2021 SUSTAINING 126 Objection to Bill of Costs and DENYING 125 Bill of Costs in total. (Coll, A) Modified on 10/13/2021 (Coll, A).
|
|
Filing
123
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/20/2021 ADOPTING IN FULL 119 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 111 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING AS MOOT 104 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/12/21 ORDERING due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Court will consider Plaintiffs 120 objections timely.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
119
AMENDED FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/15/2021 RECOMMENDING defendant's 111 motion for summary judgment be granted and plaintiff's 104 motion for summary judgment be denied as moot. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
118
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/11/2021 RECOMMENDING defendants' 111 motion for summary judgment be granted. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 3/9/2021 GRANTING Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Dr. Felder from this case. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 08/10/20 GRANTING 108 Motion for an extension of the current dispositive motions deadline and allow them to file an opposition and cross motion for summary judgment on or before 08/21/20. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 5/1/2020 DENYING plaintiff's 100 motion for referral of this case to the Court's ADR program. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
101
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/24/2020 ADOPTING 99 Findings and Recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 64 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. Plaintiff's 63 motion for summary judgment is DENIED as premature and without prejudice to renewal following the close of discovery within the time limit for fling dispositive motions set in the Court's 2/13/2020 order. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
99
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/19/2020 RECOMMENDING plaintiff's 64 motion for injunctive relief be denied; and plaintiff's 63 motion for summary judgment be denied as premature and without prejudice to renewal following the close of discovery within the time limit for filing dispositive motions set in the court's 2/13/2020 order. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/13/2020 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 78 , 84 Motions to Compel. Discovery is RE-OPENED for a period of 60 days commencing the date of this order. All requests for discovery shall be served by this new cut-off date, and any motions necessary to compel further discovery responses shall be filed within 60 days of this new cut-off date. Dispositive motions shall be filed by 7/27/2020. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/29/20 DENYING 86 plaintiff's request. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 09/24/19 ORDERING defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's 78 motion to compel within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/29/19 GRANTING 70 Plaintiff's motion for an order deeming his motion for summary judgment submitted on his current briefs and DENYING as unnecessary 71 Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/5/2019 GRANTING 51 , 60 , and 65 Motions Relating to Scheduling and this case is rescheduled as outlined below; DENYING as procedurally defective 37 , 41 , 42 , 43 , and 44 Motions Relat ed to Obtaining Discovery; DENYING as procedurally defective 39 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , and 62 Motions Related to Compelling Discovery; MODIFYING 25 Scheduling Order to re-open discovery for 120 days commencing the date of this order; and ORDERING upon conclusion of the 120 day period, the court will set new dispositive motion deadline. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/22/18 ORDERING Plaintiffs motions for appointment of experts 26 , 27 aredenied. Plaintiffs motions for leave to take depositions by written questions 31 , 32 are denied as unnecessary. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward to plaintiff ten blank subpoena forms. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER adopting in full 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/29/18. Plaintiff's 10 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/8/2018 RECOMMENDING 10 Motion for Injunctive Relief be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/24/17 ordering plaintiff's complaint 1 is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief 2 is denied. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
