Little v. AMCO Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Chad Little
Defendant: AMCO Insurance Company
Case Number: 2:2017cv00975
Filed: May 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/13/2020 SETTING a Settlement Conference for 5/5/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman and CONTINUING the Dispositive Pretrial Motion Hearing Cut-Off to 7/21/2020. (Huang, H)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/21/19 CONTINUING the dispositive pretrial motion cut-off to 10/18/19. (Coll, A)
February 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/22/2019 CONTINUING the dispositive pretrial motion hearing cut-off to 7/12/2019. (Huang, H)
July 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/23/18, ORDERING the court adopts the proposed schedule set forth in the parties July 12,2018 Mid-Litigation Conference Statement as set forth below: Non-expert discovery cut-off of 12/3/2018, FRCP 26(a)(2) expert disclosures of 12/24/2018, FRCP 26(a)(2) rebuttal disclosures of 1/11/2019, Expert Discovery cut-off of 3/1/2019, Dispositive pre-trial motion hearing cut-off of 4/5/2019. (Kastilahn, A)
March 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/26/2018 ORDERING 14 Defendant's Motion to Compel is GRANTED in PART on the terms outlined in this Order; by 4/16/2018 plaintiff shall produce all outstanding documents, files, videos, etc., and respond to defendant's request for productions of documents; within the next 14 days plaintiff and his attorney shall pay defendant $1,000.00 for the time and cost incurred in bringing this motion. (Reader, L)
November 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER Regarding Confidential Information signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/21/2017. (York, M)
October 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/11/17: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/28/2018. Discovery due by 8/6/2018. Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 12/7/2018. A mid-litigation conference is set for 6/21/2018 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Little v. AMCO Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMCO Insurance Company
Represented By: Sonia Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chad Little
Represented By: Kathleen Anne Herdell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?