Lee v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al.
Sarah R. Lee |
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development Long-Term Disability Plan |
2:2017cv00978 |
May 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Butte |
Craig M. Kellison |
Morrison C. England |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/10/2018 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED in its entirety as to all defendants, with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R) |
Filing 17 ORDER RE STIPULATION regarding standard review signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/21/17. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court has accepted the Parties' stipulation and will employ the de novo standard of review in this case. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that no discovery will be conducted by the Parties in this case. This Order regarding the appropriate standard of review is specifically limited to the facts and circumstances of this particular case.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 14 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/25/2017 ORDERING defendant Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development Long-Term Disability Plan be DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Washington, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.