Rodas v. Burke et al
| Nestor Rodas |
| J Burke, J Lewis and J Green |
| 2:2017cv01030 |
| May 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/4/2018 ORDERING Warden, litigation coordinator, and other correctional staff as needed at Salinas Valley State Prison to facilitate a confidential call between Nestor Rodas and his attorney on 1/9/2018 to begin at 11:00 a.m., to continue, without interruption, for a maximum of 90 minutes or until completed. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/10/2017 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Nestor Rodas at 9:00 a.m. on 1/17/2018 in Courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/30/17 ordering Michael E. Vinding is appointed as limited purpose counsel in the above entitled matter. This appointment is for the limited purpose of assisting plaintiff with preparing for a nd participating in a settlement conference. Michael E. Vindings appointment will terminate fifteen days after completion of the settlement conference, or any continuation of the settlement conference. Prior to the termination of the appointment, the court will accord counsel the option of proceeding as plaintiffs appointed counsel. If counsel does not wish to continue representation of plaintiff after he has carried out his limited purpose, the court will consider appointing new counsel for plaintiff, if deemed appropriate at that time. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Michael E. Vinding, Brady & Vinding, 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2640, Sacramento, CA 95814.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/10/2017. The parties shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. The assig ned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy within 30 days to schedule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. The Clerk shall serve copies of (a) plaintiff's complaint, (b) the screening order, and (c) the instant order, on Supervising DAG Monica Anderson. (cc: Monica Anderson)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/25/2017 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Nestor Rodas. CDCR is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
