Price v. Child Protective Services et al
| William Henry Price |
| Child Protective Services and K. Harris |
| 2:2017cv01031 |
| May 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Butte |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/20/19 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' 17 , 20 motions to dismiss be GRANTED, Plaintiff's first amended complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, Plai ntiff's 31 motion to substitute parties be DENIED AS MOOT and this case be closed. It is ORDERED that 16 the initial scheduling conference set for 6/13/2019 is VACATED. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and findings and recomm endations on plaintiff at 1215 Lincoln Street, Oroville, CA 95966, in addition to his current address of record. All pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and recommendations. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/18/19 GRANTING 32 Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time. The hearing on 17 , 20 motions to dismiss and 31 motion to substitute parties is CONTINUED to 5/2/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Plaintiff's opposition to the motions to dismiss and defendants' response to plaintiff's motion to substitute parties, are due 4/18/2019. Any reply briefs are due 4/25/2019. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/19/19 GRANTING Defendants' Request to redact/revise the Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of Court shall seal ECF No. [20-1], and defendants shall promptly refile the redacted version of that document on the docket. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 1/31/19 VACATING 12 Findings and Recommendations. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 12/6/18 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/24/18 DIRECTING the Clerk to add Sharon A. Stone and the Oroville Police Department as defendants; DIRECTING the clerk to issue a summons, the undersigned's new case documents, and an orde r setting this matter for an initial scheduling conference; The Clerk shall send plaintiff the summons, four USM-285 forms, and a copy of the complaint; Within 15 days Plaintiff shall submit service documents to the USM and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted. USM shall serve process within 60 days (cc: USM) (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/20/2017 GRANTING plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
