Predmore v. Stockton Enterprises, LLC et al
| Julia Predmore |
| Stockton Enterprises, LLC and Dj Vu Showgirls-Sacramento, LLC |
| 2:2017cv01091 |
| May 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Morrison C. England |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/28/2019 ORDERING Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/3/18 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION 7 is GRANTED as to Defendants' request for a stay, DENIED without prejudice as to Defendants' requests for dismissal and/or to compe l arbitration. This action is hereby STAYED until judgment in Jane Doe 1-2 v. Dj Vu Services, Inc., Case No. 2:16-cv-10877-SMJ-PTM, is final. All pending dates in this case are VACATED. Not later than sixty days following the date this order is electronically filed, and every sixty days thereafter until the stay is lifted, the parties are directed to file a joint status report advising the Court regarding the status of the Michigan action. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
