Franken v. Speer
Plaintiff: Kevin Franken
Defendant: Robert M Speer
Case Number: 2:2017cv01128
Filed: May 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Calaveras
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/3/2018 DENYING 42 Motion to Change Venue. (Michel, G.)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION, signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/18/18. (Kastilahn, A)
June 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/22/2018 GRANTING 27 and 30 Motions to Compel on the terms outlined in this order; Plaintiff shall serve supplemental initial disclosures by 7/6/2018; Plaintiff shall provide defendant with a signed authorization for release of his medical and mental health records by 6/29/2018; Parties shall file a joint status report re discovery by 8/3/2018, by 4:00 PM. (Fabillaran, J)
April 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STATUS PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 04/20/18 ORDERING that all Dispositive Motions filed by 06/18/19 and heard 07/16/19 at 1:30 p.m.; Discovery completed by 04/26/19; joint mid-litigation statements due 14 days prior to close of discovery; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 03/01/19 with any supplemental/rebuttal expert disclosures due by 03/15/19; Final Pretrial Conference set for 09/06/19 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez with a joint pretrial statement due 7 days prior; Jury Trial set for 10/21/19 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 7 days. (Benson, A.)
December 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/5/2017 ORDERING that Dr. Mark T. Esper has replaced Ryan D. McCarthy as Acting Secretary of the Department of the Army, Dr. Mark T. Esper is substituted as defendant, and all further proceedings in this action "shall be in the name of the substituted party." (Washington, S)
October 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/13/17 ORDERING that Ryan D. McCarthy has replaced Robert Speer as Acting Secretary of the Department of the Army, pursuant to FRCP 26 (d) (1), Ryan D. McCarthy is substituted as defendant, and all further proceedings in this action "shall be in the name of the substituted party." (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franken v. Speer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Franken
Represented By: Louis Demas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert M Speer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?