Awadan et al v. Reebok Corporate Headquarter
Plaintiff: Faizal Awadan and Shainaz Awadan
Defendant: Reebok Corporate Headquarter
Case Number: 2:2017cv01148
Filed: May 31, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/5/19 REMANDING CASE to Solano County Superior Court. Certified copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/23/19 ORDERING parties to meet and confer regarding the amount in controversy, and file a joint status report to the court in fourteen days either stipulating to remand or explaining why this case should not be remanded to Solano Superior County Court for lack of jurisdiction. Final Pretrial Conference RESET for 11/1/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)
September 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/18/19 DENYING Defendant's 45 Motion to Compel.(Becknal, R)
August 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/23/2019 REOPENING the discovery period in this case until 10/4/2019, for the limited purpose of considering the motion to compel and, if ordered, conducting plaintiff's deposition; Defendant's 43 Motion to Compel is DENIED without prejudice to its renewal following satisfaction of the meet-and-confer requirements under the Local Rules; and The hearing set for 9/11/2019 is VACATED. (York, M)
February 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 39 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/22/2019 REFERRING Case to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. (cc: VDRP Sacramento). (York, M)
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/6/18 ORDERING plaintiffs request for a subpoena (ECF No. 33 ) is DENIED without prejudice to any proper request to the Clerk of Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff a signed but otherwise blank subpoena duces tecum form with this order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(3(Becknal, R)
May 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/23/18 ORDERING plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 10 days, why her failure to appear at the scheduling hearing should not result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Benson, A.)
March 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/30/2018 ADOPTING 21 Findings and Recommendations in full. All claims of Faizal Awadam are DISMISSED from this case with prejudice. Plaintiff Shainaz Awadan's 1st, 2nd, 5th, 6th and 8th claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff Shainaz Awadan's 7th claim is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff Shainaz Awadan shall file an amended complaint within 21 days of this order. This matter is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for further handling as provided by the local rules. (York, M)
August 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/8/2017 RECOMMENDING that the plaintiffs' First, Second, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth causes of action be dismissed with prejudice and that the plaintiffs' Seventh cause of action be dismissed without prejudice; RECOMMENDING that Faizal Awadan be dismissed from this case with prejudice; REFERRING this matter to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; ORDERING that any objections be filed and served within twenty-one days. (Michel, G.)
July 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/27/17 ORDERING that the hearing on the 10 Amended Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 8/16/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire; plaintiff shall file a n opposition or a Statement of Non-Opposition to the motion, by 08/02/17. Failure to file an opposition or to appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Benson, A.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Awadan et al v. Reebok Corporate Headquarter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reebok Corporate Headquarter
Represented By: Barbara Allyn Blackburn
Represented By: Britney Noelle Torres
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Faizal Awadan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shainaz Awadan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?