Stearne v. Heartland Payment Systems LLC et al
| Carl Stearne |
| Heartland Payment Systems LLC and Global Payments, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv01181 |
| June 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/23/2018 ORDERING the causes of action dismissed by virtue of the Court's prior 17 Order are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; This case shall proceed on Plaintiff's remaining claim. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/14/18, ORDERING that Plaintiff has until 4/11/18 to file a second amended complaint.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER granting 18 . The Plaintiff shall have up to March 12, 2018, to file a second amended complaint. Signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/26/2018. (Deutsch, S)
|
|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/6/2018 ORDERING 12 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with leave to AMEND consistent with the foregoing; Not later than twenty (20) days following the date this Memorandum and Order is electronically filed, Plaintiff may (but is not required to) file an amended complaint. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
