Lull v. County of Sacramento et al
| Christopher Lull |
| County of Sacramento, Cory Stewart and Michael Doane |
| 2:2017cv01211 |
| June 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/22/2021 ADOPTING 81 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 65 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING 68 Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment is entered in Defendants' favor and against Plaintiff. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing
81
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/2/2021 RECOMMENDING that defendant's motion for summary judgment, 65 be granted; plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, 68 be denied; judgment be entere d in defendant Cory Stewart's favor and against plaintiff Christopher Lull; and the Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the U.S. District Judge presiding over the case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304. Within 14 days of the service of the findings and recommendations, the parties may file written objections to the findings and recommendations with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Cannarozzi, N)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/27/2021 ORDERING Defendant Cory Stewart may submit supplemental briefing within 7 days of the issuance of this order and Plaintiff Christopher Lull may submit supplemental briefing within 14 days of the issuance of this order. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/06/2020 GRANTING 49 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff is permitted to proceed on the second amended complaint's Fourth Amendment claim. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
61
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/11/2020 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's 49 Request for Reconsideration be granted. Plaintiff be permitted to proceed on the second amended complaint's Fourth Amendment claim. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
60
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/27/2020 MODIFYING the Scheduling Order as follows: Dispositive Motion Deadline extended to 90 days after the District Judge rules on 49 Motion for Reconsideration. The 10/19/2020 Trial is VACATED, to be reset following the court's ruling on all dispositive motions. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/6/2020 ADOPTING 50 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 42 Motion for Reconsideration. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/30/3030 GRANTING 48 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. Plaintiff may depose defendant Stewart for two additional hours. The deposition shall be completed by 2/28/2020. EXTENDING Discovery cut-off to 2/28/2020. Defendant Stewart shall submit a supplemental brief by l2/14/2020, and Plaintiff shall file a response to Stewart's brief no later than 2/21/2020. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
50
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/19/19 RECOMMENDING that 42 Motion for Reconsideration be Denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to these findings and recommendations are due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/28/19 ADOPTING 34 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 24 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's claims for violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments are STRICKEN and the motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim and Bane Act claim against Defendant Stewart. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
34
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/4/2019 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' 24 Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's second amended complaint be granted in part and denied in part; Plaintiff's claim s for violation of the 4th and 14th Amendments (causes of action 1 and 2) be stricken; and The motion be denied as to plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim and Bane Act claim against Stewart. Referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/30/2018 ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations in full, except as provided by footnote 1 of this Order, GRANTING 5 Motion to Dismiss, and GRANTING 10 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this Order is filed to file an amended complaint as provided in the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/1/2018 RECOMMENDING that the County of Sacramento's 5 motion to dismiss be granted and plaintiff's claims against the County be dismissed without leave to am end. Defendants' Stewart and Doane's 10 motion to dismiss be granted as follows: Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim be dismissed without leave to amend; Plaintiff's First Amendment claim be dismissed with leave to amend; The c ourt decline to exercise jurisdiction over plaintiff's Bane Act claim. Plaintiff be granted thirty days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations to file a second amended complaint. Motions referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
