Diaz v. Dixon et al
| Roy Diaz |
| N. Dixon, T. Farris, S. Gilliam, M. Collins, J. Ozman, J. Medina, Robert J. Fox, K. J. Allen and M. Voong |
| 2:2017cv01240 |
| June 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/7/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/30/18 ADOPTING 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: All defendants other than defendants Dixon and Ferris are DISMISSED. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/26/2017 ORDERING Clerk to assign a district judge to this case; DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit service documents and USM-285 forms; and RECOMMENDING all defend ants other than Dixon and Ferris be dismissed. Service is appropriate for N. Dixon and T. Farris. Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 2 USM-285 Forms with instruction sheet, and 1 copy of the Complaint filed on 6/15/2017. Plaintiff to comple te and submit Notice of Submission of Documents with service documents within 30 days from the date of this order. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/9/2017 GRANTING plaintiff's 2 , 6 request to proceed IFP. Within 30 days, plaintiff may file an amended complaint that complies with the terms of this order. If plaintiff chooses not file an amended complaint, this action will proceed on plaintiff's claims arising under the Eighth Amendment against defendants Dixon and Ferris. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
