Johnson v. Oishi, et al.
| Scott Johnson |
| Jeri Oishi and Aloha Flowers, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv01256 |
| June 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| El Dorado |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/22/2019 GRANTING 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Inasmuch as the Court does not believe that the shortcomings of Plaintiff's Complaint can be rectified through amendment, no leave to file an amended pleading will be permitted. Moreover, because the Court has dismissed Plaintiff's ADA claims as MOOT, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims. Since the case has now been concluded in its entirety. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/15/2018 GRANTING 11 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and DENYING 7 Motion to Dismiss as moot; Plaintiff is directed to file its Proposed First Amended Complaint within 10 days. Defendants can renew their Motion to Dismiss should it be appropriate to do so after the First Amended Complaint has been filed. (Fabillaran, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
