Carreon v. Abdur-Rahman et al
| Antonio Carreon |
| S. Abdur-Rahman and Bonnie Lee |
| 2:2017cv01292 |
| June 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/6/2020 ADOPTING in FULL 44 Findings and Recommendations. GRANTING 39 Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against defendant Lee based on her role in the 2015 RAP are DISMISSED based on Plain tiff's failure to exhaust such claims, in all other respects, the motion on exhaustion grounds is DENIED. Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Plaintiff's remaining 8th Amendment claims against Dr. Lee, and all of Plaintiff's 8th Amendment claims against Dr. Abdur-Rahman are GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/30/2019 ORDERING Clerk to strike 43 Unauthorized Sur-Reply and RECOMMENDING Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims against defendant Lee based on her role in the 2015 RAP be dismissed based on plaintiffs failure to exhaust such claim; in all other respects, the motion on exhaustion grounds (ECF No. 39) be denied; Defendants motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 39) on plaintiffs remaining Eighth Amendment cl aims against defendant Dr. Lee, and all of plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claims against defendant Dr. Abdur-Rahman, be granted; and the Clerk be directed to enter judgment and terminate this action. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/16/19 DENYING 37 plaintiff's motion. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/6/19 DENYING 35 Request without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/16/2018 DIRECTING the Clerk to STRIKE plaintiff's 28 amended complaint; this action shall proceed on plaintiff's original complaint; and defendants S. Abdur-Rahman and B. Lee shall file a responsive pleading within thirty days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/27/18 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 9/15/18 in full; GRANTING in part and DENYING in part Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 19 ): Defendants' motion to dismiss Pla intiff's retaliation claims against Defendant Dr. Abdur-Rahman, based on medical treatment provided before 7/26/15, is DISMISSED with prejudice; and Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's retaliation claims against Defendant Dr. Abd ur-Rahman based on medical treatment provided or not provided after 7/26/15 is DISMISSED with leave to amend; in the alternative, Plaintiff may choose to proceed on his original complaint based solely on his Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference c laims. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Eight Amendment deliberate indifference claims is DENIED without prejudice to renewal in a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of this Order. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint within that time, the action will proceed on the original complaint for only the Eight Amendment deliberate indifference claims. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/15/2018 DIRECTING Clerk of Court to assign a district judge to this case; DENYING without prejudice 23 Motion to Amend; and RECOMMENDING 19 Motion to Dismiss be granted in part and denied in part, as detailed in this order. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/11/2017 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 14 motion for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. The parties shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. The assigned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy within 30 days to sch edule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. The Clerk shall serve copies of (a) plaintiff's complaint, (b) the screening order, and (c) the instant order, on Supervising DAG Monica Anderson. (cc: Monica Anderson) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/8/2017. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/5/2017 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Antonio Carreon. The Director of the CDCR shall collect monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/23/2017. New Case Number 2:17-cv-00837-KJN (PC). Old Case Number 1:17-cv-00837-SAB (PC). (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
