Valero Refining Company California v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company
| Valero Refining Company California |
| Pacific Gas & Electric Company |
| 2:2017cv01350 |
| June 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/26/2020 GRANTING 39 plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint and DENYING 63 plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Deadlines. Plaintiff to file its second amended complaint not later than 14 days from the electronic filing of this Order. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading not later than 21 days after the filing of Plaintiff's second amended complaint. The parties are to file a second supplemental joint status report, proposing new dates and deadlines going forward, not later than 30 days from the date of electronic filing of this Order. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/4/19 GRANTING Plaintiff Valero Refining Company-California's Request to Seal Documents.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/28/19 DENYING 46 Application for Temporary Stay. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/14/18, ORDERING that the Pretrial Scheduling Order is AMENDED as follows: Close of Fact Discovery due by 8/24/18, Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/19/2018, supplemental expert disclosures due by 11/16/18, and the deadline for hearing on dispositive motions is 2/7/2019. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
31
AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/7/2018. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/22/2017 ORDERING PG&E shall file and serve any motion to dismiss Valero's Complaint by 8/21/2017 and notice any motion to dismiss for hearing on 10/5/2017; Valero shall file and serve any opposition to any motion to dismiss the Complaint by 9/14/2017; PG&E shall file and serve any reply to Valero's opposition by 9/28/2017.(Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Valero Refining Company California v. Pacific Gas & Electric Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Valero Refining Company California | |
| Represented By: | John Cox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pacific Gas & Electric Company | |
| Represented By: | Laura Joy Edelstein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
