Ransom v. Sacramento Housing Redeveloping Agency et al
| Clinton Ransom |
| Sacramento Housing Redeveloping Agency, Theresa Christobal, Cendy Rbjos, Volunteers of America and Gretchen Angele |
| 2:2017cv01366 |
| July 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L. Nunley |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/23/18, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's order. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/20/18 ORDERING that plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, within 14 days, why his failure to file an amended complaint should not result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of an amended complaint within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/12/2018 ADOPTING 25 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendants' 15 motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety, with leave to amend within 30 days of the date of this Order. Defendants' 7 , 8 motions for a more definite statement are DENIED as moot. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/13/2017 RECOMMENDING that 15 Motion to Dismiss be granted, 1 Complaint be dismissed in its entirety, with leave to amend within 30 days of the date the final order dismissing the complaint is entered, and 7 and 8 Motions for More Definite Statement be denied as moot. Referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/21/2017 CONTINUING hearings on 7 , 8 , and 15 Motions, to 12/13/2017, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 26 (AC), before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a Statement of Non-Opposition to each pending motion no later than 11/29/2017. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/26/2017 CONTINUING the motion hearing for 7 & 8 Motions for a More Definite Statement to 11/29/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The 15 Motion to Dismiss will remain set for 11/29/2017 at 10:00 am. Plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition is due by 11/15/2017. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/10/2017 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the Clerk to issue forthwith. SERVICE IS APPROPRIATE for defendants: Sacramento Housing Redeveloping Agency, Theresa Chistobal, Cendy Rbjos, Volunteers of America and Gretchen Angele. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to supply the USM with the necessary forms within 15 days from the date of this order and the USM shall service process within 90 days of the date of this order. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
