Ransom et al v. Mack et al
Clinton Ransom, R.E.R., Robert Lopez, Lorene Thomas and R.L. |
Michael Mack, Jr., Bruce Mintzer and Mike Mack, Sr. |
2:2017cv01367 |
July 5, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Garland E. Burrell |
Housing/Accommodations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/24/17 Recommending that this action re 1 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with the court's order. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to these F&Rs due within twenty-one (21) days.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 4 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/10/17 ORDERING that plaintiff shall show cause, within 14 days, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filling of a new IFP application and an amended complaint will discharge this order. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/10/2017 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP without prejudice. Plaintiff must file his renewed IFP Application and amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (Donati, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.