Zaccardi v. Arnold
| Albert Zaccardi |
| E. Arnold |
| 2:2017cv01405 |
| July 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/28/19 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed as moot without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/25/2019 ORDERING, petitioner shall show cause, if any he has, why this action should not be dismissed as moot; respondent shall file a reply within 14 days thereafter. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/5/2018 ADOPTING in FULL 25 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 20 Motion to Dismiss; Petitioner's second claim is DISMISSED as barred by the statute o f limitations; Respondents motion to dismiss petitioners Eighth Amendment claim (claim one) is DENIED; Within 30 days from the date of this order adopting the findings and recommendations, Respondent shall file an answer to petitioner's Eighth Amendment claim (claim one).(Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/23/2018 RECOMMENDING 20 Motion to Dismiss be granted in part and denied in part and within 30 days from the date of any district court order adopting these findings and recommendations, respondent to file an answer to petitioner's Eighth Amendment claim (claim one). Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/28/17 DISCHARGING 6 the order to show cause. Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days from the date of this order. The clerk of the court is directed to send petitioner the court's form for application for writ of habeas corpus. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/13/17 granting 3 Motion to Proceed IFP. Within 30 days from the date of this order, petitioner shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Zaccardi v. Arnold | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Albert Zaccardi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: E. Arnold | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
