DKB, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America et al
DKB, Inc. |
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America and Koo Construction Inc. |
2:2017cv01425 |
July 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Troy L. Nunley |
Miller Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1352 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/18/17: Parties in Sheppard Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, et al., 2:17-cv-00094-KJN, shall file dispositional documents by February 1 4, 2018. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, parties shall show cause as to why the hearing set for January 25, 2018 should not be vacated, and why the motions to consolidate (DKB, Inc., 2:17-cv-01425-KJN, ECF No. 19; Sheppard Mechanical, 2:17-cv-00094-KJN, ECF No. 22) should not be denied as moot. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/12/17: The Clerk of the Court shall reassign this case to the Honorable Kendall J. Newman, Magistrate Judge. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:17-cv- 01425-KJN. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge Nunley are hereby VACATED. (Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.