Lipsey v. Kalil, et al.
| Christopher Lipsey, Jr. |
| Kalil and K. Spencer |
| 2:2017cv01429 |
| July 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kings |
| Allison Claire |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/05/22 DENYING 69 Motion for Reconsideration. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/25/2022 GRANTING defendants' 73 motion to stay and briefing on the motion for summary judgment is STAYED pending approval of the settlement agreement in Coleman v. Newsom, No. 2:90-cv-0 520 KJM DB (E.D. Cal.). In the event the settlement agreement is not approved, within one day of the order disapproving the settlement agreement defendants shall file a notice advising the court that the settlement agreement was not approved. Defendants may file a reply in support of their motion for summary judgment within seven days of that notice. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/15/2022 DENYING plaintiff's 66 motion to compel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/11/2022 DENYING 58 Motion to Compel and for Sanctions; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 61 Motion to Compel and for Sanctions as follows: GRANTING as to Request for Production No. 11 a nd ORDERING within 10 days of the filing of this order, defendant Hamad shall provide plaintiff with copies of the appeals section of the Department Operations Manual and any other policies controlling the appeals process at CSP-SAC that were in effe ct from October 2016 through the filing of the first amended complaint and otherwise DENYING the motion; and ORDERING within 30 days of the service of this order, plaintiff may file a supplemental opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/1/2021 DENYING plaintiff's 57 request for appointment of counsel. Within 21 days, defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's motion for sanctions and to compel. Plaintiff may file a reply within fourteen days of service of the response. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/22/21 ORDERING that within 21 days of the service of this order, plaintiff shall file either (1) an opposition to defendants motion for summary judgment or statement of non-opposition or (2) a motion to compel discovery responses that complies withthe instructions outlined above.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/5/2021 ORDERING, within 21 days, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition to the 49 motion for summary judgment, or a statement of non-opposition. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/10/2021 VACATING 46 Motion for Sanctions without prejudice; GRANTING 50 Motion to Stay Discovery except to the extent that Plaintiff may seek to compel responses to discovery related to the exhaustion of his administrative remedies; ORDERING Plaintiff may file a motion to compel response to discovery requests related to the exhaustion of his administrative remedies as set forth in this order within 14 days of the service of this order and STAYING discovery otherwise pending the resolution of defendant's motion for summary judgment; VACATING the 8/27/2021 discovery deadline and 11/18/2021 dispositive motions deadline. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/13/21 ADOPTING in full 41 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 38 defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Defendants shall file an answer to the amended complaint within 21 days ofthe electronic filing of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
41
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/09/21 RECOMMENDING that defendants motion to dismiss, ECF No. 38, be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a. GRANTED as to Plaintiffs request for injunctive relief , and b. DENIED in all other respects. If these findings and recommendations are adopted by the District Judge, Defendants be directed to file an answer to the amended complaint within 21 days of the orderadopting these findings and recommendations. Motion to Dismiss 38 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/9/2020 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Christopher Lipsey, Jr. via telephonic-conferencing on 11/17/2020 at 1:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian. (cc: KJN) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/5/2020 GRANTING 30 Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Petition for order appointing Zakiya Jahan as guardian ad litem for defendant M. Khalil is GRANTED. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/10/20 REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/3/2020 DENYING 19 Motion for Reconsideration. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/26/19 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley randomly assigned to this action. The new case number is 2:17-cv-1429 TLN AC (PC). (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/22/2019 DENYING 17 Request to Transfer Case to State Superior Court. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/18/2019DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Christopher Lipsey, Jr. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/13/19 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees shall be collected in accordance with the court's CDC order filed concurrently herewith. The clerk of the court is directed to strike the first amended complaint 6 from the record and to send plaintiff a copy of the first amended complaint with this order. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Within 30 days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff may file an amended complaint. The clerk of court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the prisoner complaint form used in this district.. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the Sacramento Division, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/10/17. New Case Number 2:17-cv-01429-AC (PC). Old Case Number 1:17-cv-00897-EPG (PC). (Marrujo, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
