Ransom v. Brown et al
Plaintiff: Clinton Ransom
Defendant: Larry Brown and Eric Krammer
Case Number: 2:2017cv01439
Filed: July 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/1/2018 RECOMMENDING that the 1 Complaint should be dismissed with prejudice. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England. (Hunt, G)
December 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/4/2017 ORDERING the Clerk is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve within 90 days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pr ocedure 4, including a copy of this court's status order, without prepayment of costs. The Clerk shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form for each named defendant, one summons, a copy of the complaint, an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge, and the court's status order. Within 14 days, plaintiff is directed to supply the U.S. Marshal all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. (Zignago, K.)
July 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/14/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 2 is GRANTED. Service on the named defendants is appropriate. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the USM is directed to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to FRCP 4, including a copy of this court's status order, without prepayment of costs; The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff one USM-2 85 form for each named defendant, one summons, a copy of the complaint, an appropriate form for consent to trial by a Magistrate Judge, and this courts status order. Plaintiff is directed to supply the USM, within 14 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ransom v. Brown et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clinton Ransom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Krammer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?