Shapiro v. Commissioner of Social Security
Inna Shapiro |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2017cv01465 |
July 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Disability Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/22/2020 GRANTING 28 Motion for Attorney Fees, AWARDING Counsel for plaintiff $25,000.00 in attorney's fees, and DIRECTING Counsel for plaintiff to remit to plaintiff the amount of $3,112.09 for EAJA fees previously paid to counsel by the Commissioner. (Huang, H) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/2/19 AWARDING plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $3,112.09 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C.§ 1920. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/20/18 GRANTING plaintiff's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING Commissioner's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration consistent with this order. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/16/2018 ORDERING the plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to March 16, 2018. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/6/2018 GRANTING Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is EXTENDED to 3/15/2018. (Reader, L) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/09/18 ORDERING that the date for plaintiff to file a Motion for Summary Judgment is EXTENDED to 01/12/18. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/14/2017 GRANTING 3 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve the undersigneds scheduling order in social security cases; the Clerk of the C ourt is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal; within 14 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the USM a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the USM; the USM is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than 60 days from the date of this order. (Reader, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shapiro v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Inna Shapiro | |
Represented By: | Jesse S. Kaplan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Marcelo N. Illarmo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.