Stanley v. State of California
| State of California |
| George Stanley |
| 2:2017cv01486 |
| July 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in Full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2018 DISMISSING with prejudice Petitioner's 1 Application for a writ of habeas corpus based on lack of jurisdiction; Respondent's 7 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot; The court DECLINES to issue the Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/13/18 ORDERING this case be randomly assigned to a District Court Judge. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be d ismissed with prejudice based on lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED, that respondent's motion to dismiss be denied as moot in light of this court's lack of jurisdiction. MOTION to DISMISS 7 assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/30/2017 ORDERING petitioner may file a request for a stay and abeyance addressing each of the three Rhines factors described in this order within 30 days from the date of this order; or, p etitioner may file a notice of exhaustion if he has fully exhausted his state court remedies. Respondent may file an opposition to the request for a stay within 14 days from the date of filing of the stay request. The Clerk shall substitute Suzanne M. Peery, Warden of CCC, as respondent.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/20/2017 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stanley v. State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: George Stanley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
