Wallin-Reed v. Arnold
| Eric Arnold |
| Gregory Chad Wallin-Reed |
| 2:2017cv01495 |
| July 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/14/2022 ADOPTING 31 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 1 Petitioner's application for a writ of Habeas Corpus; The Court DECLINES to issue the Certificate of Appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing
31
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/7/2022 RECOMMENDING that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Referred to District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 09/20/18 GRANTING 7 Motion to Stay. Petitioner shall file a status report with this Court every 90 days until such time as the California Supreme Court issues a decision with respect to Petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Once the California Supreme Court renders a decision, Petitioner is ordered to file a "Notice of Exhaustion" with this Court within 21 days of the date of the opinion. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/4/2018 RECOMMENDING petitioner's 7 motion for a stay and abeyance of his federal habeas corpus petition be granted; petitioner be ordered to file a status rep ort with this court every 90 days until such a time as the CA Supreme Court issues a decision with respect to petitioner's ineffective assistance of counsel claims; and once the CA Supreme Court renders a decision, petitioner be ordered to file a "Notice of Exhaustion" with this court within 21 days of the date of the opinion. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/25/2018 ORDERING petitioner to file a response to this Order to Show Cause with evidence demonstrating his good cause for failure to exhaust state court remedies within 30 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/19/2017 VACATING the schedule previously set for respondent's answer to the petition and any reply by petitioner; and a new briefing schedule will be set upon disposition of petitioner's motion for a stay and abeyance. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wallin-Reed v. Arnold | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Gregory Chad Wallin-Reed | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eric Arnold | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
