Twin Sisters Gun Club, et al. vs. Emlen, et al.
Twin Sisters Gun Club and Thomas Bock |
County of Solano, Minh C. Tran and William F. Emlen |
2:2017cv01526 |
July 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Morrison C England |
Gregory G Hollows |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 CASE CLOSED pursuant to #21 Stipulation of Dismissal. (Washington, S) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION of DISMISSAL by Thomas Bock, Twin Sisters Gun Club. (Michel, Carl) |
Filing 20 ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/28/2018 CONTINUING the deadline for discovery to 12/31/2018. (Hunt, G) |
Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: The Court received the unnoticed Motion for 163-Day Extension of Time to Complete Discovery and Proposed Order #18 . Within the filing and subsequent to the defense Motion, counsel included a signed Stipulation to Extend Discovery Deadlines and Proposed Order. The Court construes this filing as a Stipulation and Proposed Order. Counsel are directed to comply with Local Rule 137(b), regarding the requirements for proper filing of a proposed order and are required to email the proposed order (in Microsoft Word) to chambers in addition to filing the pdf version via the CM/ECF system. Pursuant to Local Rules 101 and 131(c), the definition for "signature", you may enter /s/ for signatures for all counsel. Please submit your proposed order today, in Microsoft Word format to: mceorders@caed.uscourts.gov. (Deutsch, S) |
Filing 18 MOTION for 163-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to Extend Time to Complete Discovery by County of Solano, William F. Emlen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bangle, Raymond) Modified on 6/20/2018 (Zignago, K.). |
Filing 17 ANSWER with Jury Demand by County of Solano, William F. Emlen.(Bangle, Raymond) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/14/2018 GRANTING #9 Motion to Dismiss as to defendant Minh C. Tran and DENYING as to Defendants County of Solano and Emlen. No leave to amend will be permitted as to Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Tran inasmuch as the Court does not believe the shortcomings of those claims can be rectified through amendment. (Washington, S) |
Filing 15 JOINT STATUS REPORT by Twin Sisters Gun Club. Attorney Franklin, Scott McClintock added. (Franklin, Scott) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9), scheduled for hearing on October 19, 2017, is submitted without oral argument and the hearing is vacated. If the Court determines that oral argument is needed it will be scheduled at a later date. Any outstanding request for telephonic appearance is denied as moot. (Deutsch, S) |
Filing 13 REPLY by County of Solano, William F. Emlen, Minh C. Tran re #12 Opposition to Motion. Attorney Shepard, Nicholas R. added. (Shepard, Nicholas) |
Filing 12 OPPOSITION by Twin Sisters Gun Club to #9 MOTION to DISMISS. (Michel, Carl) |
Filing 11 AMENDED NOTICE of #9 MOTION to DISMISS : Motion Hearing set for 10/19/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. (Bangle, Raymond) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT ONLY) by CRD for Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/29/2017: Defendants in this matter have scheduled hearing of a #9 Motion to Dismiss before Magistrate Judge Hollows in error. This matter must be heard by District Judge Morrison C. England. Defendants are therefore directed to renotice this motion to be heard by Judge England who has civil motion calendars on designated Thursdays as reflected in the Standard Information found on his page on the court's website, www/caed.uscourts.gov "All Judges.(Anderson, J) |
Filing 9 MOTION to DISMISS by County of Solano, William F. Emlen, Minh C. Tran. Motion Hearing set for 10/19/2017 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities)(Bangle, Raymond) |
Filing 8 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by County of Solano, William F. Emlen, Minh C. Tran. Attorney Bangle, Raymond added. (Bangle, Raymond) |
Filing 7 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: All Defendants on 7/26/17. (Michel, Carl) |
Filing 6 [DISREGARD see #7 ]SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: William F. Emlen served on 7/26/2017. (Michel, Carl)R). |
Filing 5 [DISREGARD see #7 ]SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Minh C. Tran served on 7/26/2017. (Michel, Carl) |
Filing 4 [DISREGARD see #7 ] SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: County of Solano served on 7/25/2017. (Michel, Carl) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *County of Solano, William F. Emlen, Minh C. Tran* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Carl Dawson Michel* *Michel & Associates, P.C.* *180 East Ocean Blvd., Suite 200* *Long Beach, CA 90802*. (Benson, A) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County of Solano, William F. Emlen, Minh C. Tran by Twin Sisters Gun Club, Thomas Bock (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 0972-7170992) . Attorney Michel, Carl Dawson added. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Michel, Carl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.