Monster Energy Company v. Beastup LLC
| Monster Energy Company |
| Beastup LLC |
| 2:2017cv01605 |
| August 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
ORDER; FINDINGS of FACT and CONCLUSIONS of LAW signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/14/2022. Final judgment is entered in favor of Monster and against BeastUp on Monster's claims: BeastUp is directed to file with this cour t and serve on Monster within thirty days after the service of this order, a written statement report, under oath, confirming it has complied with the injunction as provided by 15 U.S.C. § 1116. The parties are ordered to meet and confer and within thirty days after service of this order file a joint status report explaining whether BeastUp has delivered to Monster for destruction all materials in BeastUp's possession that the court has found to infringe on Monster's marks, or whether the parties have otherwise agreed to disposition of the infringing materials, consistent with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. § 1118. The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/2/2021 GRANTING without prejudice 70 Motion in Limine, to the use of such evidence or arguments in a post-trial motion for attorneys' fees. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/5/2021 ORDERING the Bench Trial is RESET to 12/7/2021 at 9:00 a.m.; the Motion in limine hearing is RESET to 12/7/2021 at 9:00 a.m.; the Bench trial set for 6/22/2021 at 9:00 a.m. is VACATED; and the Courtroom Deputy will communicate with counsel in advance of trial regarding trial procedure and housekeeping matters relating to the use of videoconference technology for the anticipated proceedings. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
84
AMENDED ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/2/2020 ORDERING Bench Trial RESET to 6/22/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Motion in Limine 70 Heari ng RESET to 6/22/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The Courtroom Deputy will communicate with counsel in advance of trial regarding trial procedure and housekeeping matters relating to the use of videoconference technology for an evidentiary proceeding of this kind.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/1/2020 ORDERING Bench Trial is Reset for 6/21/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, and the Motion in Limine Hearing 70 is Reset to 6/22/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/20/20 ORDERING that the Bench Trial set for 9/21/2020 is VACATED and RESET for 1/25/2021 at 1:30 PM and the hearing on Plaintiff's 70 Motion in Limine is also RESET for 1/25/2021 at 1:30 PM. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/2/2020 ORDERING that the Bench Trial set for 6/22/2020 is VACATED and RESET for 9/21/2020 at 1:30 PM. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiff's 70 Motion in Limine is also RESET for 9/21/2020 at 1:30 PM. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/13/2019 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART plaintiff's 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. The court DENIES plaintiff's motion for summary judgment of plaintiff's claims for t rademark infringement, false designation or origin, unfair competition, trademark cancellation and trademark dilution. The court GRANTS the motion as to defendant's affirmative defenses of laches, waiver, acquiescence, unclean hands and pr iority. The court SETS 10/4/2019, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 3 (KJM), before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, for the final pretrial conference. The parties' joint final pretrial conference statement is due 14 days prior to the final pretrial conference. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER AFTER HEARING signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/17/2018 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART plaintiff's 30 Motion to Compel. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/7/17. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Monster Energy Company v. Beastup LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monster Energy Company | |
| Represented By: | Matthew S. Bellinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Beastup LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
