International Paper Company v. Teamsters District Council 2, Local 388M
International Paper Company |
Teamsters District Council 2, Local 388M |
Teamsters District Council 2, Local 388M |
International Paper Company |
2:2017cv01606 |
August 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Troy L. Nunley |
Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/19/2018 DISMISSING this matter in its entirety; Each part shall bear its own costs and fees. (Fabillaran, J) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/26/2018 ORDERING that the Petitioner/Counter Respondent International Paper Company's Motion to Vacate the Arbitration Award is CONTINUED from March 8, 2018 to May 3, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.; and Briefing will proceed according to Code. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/3/2018 ORDERING that: Petitioner/Counter Respondent International Paper Company's Motion to Vacate the Arbitration Award is CONTINUED from February 8, 2018 to March 8, 2018; and Briefing will proceed according to Code. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 12 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/3/2017 ORDERING that the hearing re 4 Motion to Vacate the Arbitration Award is CONTINUED from 11/16/2017 to 2/8/2018. (Zignago, K.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.