Gates v. Amtrak

Gates v. Amtrak

Plaintiff:	Nathan Gates
Defendant:	Amtrak
Case Number:	2:2017cv01615
Filed:	August 3, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge:	Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 15, 2017	Filing 7 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/15/17 ORDERING that the 11/22/17 hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and the 1/17/18 Initial Conference are VACATED. Further, it is RECOMMENDED that t his Action 1 be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to comply with Court Orders and the Court's Local Rules. These FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS are submitted to U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 11, 2017	Filing 6 ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/11/17 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendant's MOTION to DISMISS 4 is CONTINUED to 11/22/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Br ennan. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 11/8/17, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending Motion. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non- opposition thereto, no later than 11/8/17. Defendants may file a reply to Plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 11/15/17. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 15, 2017

Filing 7 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/15/17 ORDERING that the 11/22/17 hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and the 1/17/18 Initial Conference are VACATED. Further, it is RECOMMENDED that t his Action 1 be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to comply with Court Orders and the Court's Local Rules. These FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS are submitted to U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

September 11, 2017

Filing 6 ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/11/17 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendant's MOTION to DISMISS 4 is CONTINUED to 11/22/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Br ennan. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, no later than 11/8/17, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending Motion. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non- opposition thereto, no later than 11/8/17. Defendants may file a reply to Plaintiff's opposition, if any, on or before 11/15/17. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gates v. Amtrak
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Gates
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Amtrak
Represented By:	Jeremy James Schroeder
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?