Rogers v. Brown et al
Kim Edward Rogers |
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Joseph A. Farrow, George Vasiliou, John L. Koon, Edmond J. Bertola and Christopher L. Mattews |
2:2017cv01643 |
August 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Deborah Barnes |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/5/2018 RECOMMENDINGING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/31/2018 ORDERING that in regards to Notice of Related Case that it is inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. (Washington, S) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/23/17 ORDERING that The complaint filed 8/8/17 1 is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Within twenty-eight days from the date of this order, an amended complaint shall be filed that cures the defects noted in this order and complies with the FRCP and the Local Rules of Practice. The amended complaint must bear the case number assigned to this action and must be titled "Amended Complaint." (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.