Bangert v. County of Placer et al
| Beau Bangert |
| County of Placer, Placer County Sheriff's Office, Devon M. Bell, Robert L. Madden and Megan C. Yaws |
| 2:2017cv01667 |
| August 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/29/20 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of Mr. McKennas letter filed May 26, 2020 96 on plaintiffs counsel. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
97
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/27/20 extending time and modifying procedure to locate and pay certain approved class claimants. (See order for further details.) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/19/19 ORDERING that plaintiffs request to review some of the claimants medical records without authority from the claimants is denied without prejudice; if there is anything the court can do to assist the parties in locating the claimants, the parties shall contact the court. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/29/2019 GRANTING Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; FINAL JUDGMENT; and DISMISSAL with Prejudice. See Order for details. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/19/2019 ORDERING all claims under $50,000 which have been found by plaintiffs counsel to be compensable will be accepted, see order for exceptions; ORDERING Counsel for the County will pr ovide class counsel with a list of claims which were not filed under penalty of perjury, which allege incidents which occurred outside of a Placer County Correctional Facility, which do not allege any incident of force or retaliation by Correctional staff, or which are clearly fraudulent by 5/22/2019; ORDERING for claims under $50,000 which were not filed under penalty of perjury, the claimants will be contacted by class counsel and provided with a one-time opportunity to sign his or her cl aim under penalty of perjury within 30 days of class counsel contacting them; ORDERING Counsel will have 30 days to meet and confer regarding the list provided by counsel for the County. In the event that agreement cannot be reached within the meet and confer period, counsel will request a telephonic discovery conference with the court to discuss the process for addressing any disputed claims with the court; and ORDERING for claims of $50,000 or $100,000 which have been found by plain tiffs counsel to be compensable class counsel together with the claims administrator will request substantiation of medical records from the claimants to occur within 30 days; ORDERING Class counsel will formally file the Motion for Final Approval; a nd ORDERING in the event of any disputes regarding use of force set forth in the quarterly audits, counsel will meet and confer with regard to the uses of force but is not required to bring those issues to the attention of the court until 30 days prior to the termination of the Reporting Period (as that term is defined in the settlement agreement). See Order for details. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/20/19 ORDERING for the reasons stated at the hearing, the undersigned finds that the settlement agreement does not preclude plaintiffs from filing a second citizens complaint.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/25/2019 DENYING 62 Motions to Seal and to Retain Confidentiality; ORDERING the following materials are not longer subject to the protective order: 1) PC000142 video footage of Mr. Bangert ; 2) PC00143 video footage of Mr. Bangert; 3) PC000144 - 156 - various photos of Mr. Bangert; 4) PC0001526 - 1532 Incident Report regarding Bangert incident; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to unseal all pleadings filed in connection with the Motion t o Seal and to Retain Confidentiality, with the exceptions of the 5 CD discs submitted by defendants as Exhibit K in support of the Motion to Retain Confidentiality; and DIRECTING Clerk of Court to send defense counsel Julia Reeves the 5 CD discs submitted in support of the Motion to Retain Confidentiality, previously filed under seal. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/20/2018 PROVISIONALLY GRANTING 60 Request to Seal; ORDERING Defendants to file further briefing in support of the request to seal, as detailed in this order, on or before 1/4/2019 and Plainti ff may file a reply on or before 1/14/2019; DIRECTING Clerk of Court to file under seal all documents/materials/exhibits, previously submitted regarding the request to seal and motion to retain confidentiality including 1) defendants proof of service of request to seal; 2) defendants request to seal; 3) defendants motion to retain confidentiality and attached exhibits; 4) defendants proposed order regarding request to seal; and 5) the 22 documents submitted by plaintiff in support of the opposition; and CONFIRMING the 1/17/2019 hearing regarding Defendants' motion to seal and to retain confidentiality. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/07/18 ORDERING the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs Unopposed 57 Application for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. (Final Approval Hearing set for 3/28/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman.), This Action is hereby stayed pending Final Approval, except for any activities set forth in the Settlement Agreement. (See order for further details.)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
42
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/26/18, ORDERING that the action denominated 2:18-cv-00026-MCE-GGH, is REASSIGNED to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:18-cv-00026-TLN-KJN. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
39
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/26/18 ORDERING that all parties shall abide by the terms of the stipulated protective order filed 3/12/18. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/12/2018 ORDERING within 14 days, counsel representing plaintiff in this action shall inform the court whether plaintiff will attend the settlement conference; counsel shall also inform the court whether plaintiff attending the conference is incarcerated, and if so, provide information regarding where plaintiff is incarcerated. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/14/17 ORDERING that Within fourteen days of the date of this order, counsel for Plaintiff in 17- cv-1667 and counsel for defendants in the above-entitled cases shall inform the court whether they have any opposition to relating these cases. The Clerk of the Court shall serve the instant order on all counsel in the above entitled cases. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/28/2017 EXTENDING time to respond to the complaint. Defendants shall have until 11/2/2017 to respond to plaintiff's complaint.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
