Nordyke et al v. Summit Receivables
| Laura Nordyke and Bonnie Nordyke |
| Summit Receivables |
| 2:2017cv01705 |
| August 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| William B. Shubb |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/05/18 GRANTING Plaintiffs 47 Motion for a Judgment Debtor Examination; defendant must respond to points 1-4 and 6-15 in plaintiffs' motion. At oral argument on 09/05/18, plaintiffs withdrew point 5. Anthony Guadagna will sit for a judgment debtor examination on or before 09/28/18, in Henderson, Nevada. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
44
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/06/18 RECOMMENDING that: the 40 Motion for Default Judgment be granted; the court enter judgment against the defendant on all claims; the court award $2,000 in sta tutory damages to Bonnie Nordyke; the court award $2,000 in statutory damages to Laura Nordyke; the court grant plaintiff's request for attorney's fees in the amount of $12,972.50 and costs in the amount of $470.00; and this case be closed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to these F&Rs due within 21 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATION and ORDER 36 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/20/2018 GRANTING 22 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney for defendant Summit Receivables. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/23/2018 GRANTING 30 Attorney Michael Arguss' Request for Telephonic Appearance at the Motion to Withdraw Hearing set for 3/5/2018 at 1:30 p.m. The courtroom deputy shall e-mail counsel with the instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/21/2018 GRANTING 25 Defense attorney Margaret Foley's Request for Telephonic Appearance at the 3/5/2018, 1:30 p.m. Motion to Withdraw Hearing. The courtroom deputy shall email counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/25/2018 ORDERING Plaintiffs' motion to compel (ECF No. 17 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiffs' requests for admission issued to defendant are deemed ADMITTED; Defendant i s ORDERED to submit full responses to plaintiffs' interrogatories, requests for production, and 30(b)(6) notice within 10 days of this order; Plaintiffs are ORDERED to submit the necessary documentation of fees and costs related to this motion t o compel within 10 days of this order so that the court can issue a follow-up order regarding reimbursement of fees and costs; Defense counsel Margaret Grace Foley is ORDERED to show cause in writing,within 10 days of this order, why monetary sanct ions should not be issued against her; and Defendants are put on notice that failure to comply with this order or continued discovery related transgressions may result in further sanctions, up to and including entry of judgment against it.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/11/18: HEARING as to 17 Motion to Compel CONTINUED to 1/24/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
